<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fragmentation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://configures.sarahelkins.org/2007/08/03/fragmentation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://configures.sarahelkins.org/2007/08/03/fragmentation/</link>
	<description>Figure it out ... with me!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:49:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ConFigures &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Last Day to Give One, Get One XO laptop</title>
		<link>http://configures.sarahelkins.org/2007/08/03/fragmentation/comment-page-1/#comment-9479</link>
		<dc:creator>ConFigures &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Last Day to Give One, Get One XO laptop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://configures.sarahelkins.org/?p=48#comment-9479</guid>
		<description>[...] Unless they extend it again, this is the last day to get your own One Laptop Per Child laptop (by paying for two). I have enjoyed mine more the more I&#8217;ve used them &#8212; I got one with Paypal and the other by ordering over the phone (credit card). I&#8217;ve been able to mesh-collaborate successfully (Write activity; two of us working on one doc and seeing each others&#8217; changes real-time). I&#8217;m getting really fond of the Journal: reverse-chronological, add-your-own-metadata don&#8217;t-call-it-a-file-system (an answer to Catherine Devlin&#8217;s birthday wish?). I&#8217;m very happy with its 3 USB drives and 1 SD drive, its lightness and ruggedness, its ebook Tranformers and screen rotation. I&#8217;ve downloaded and used some of the extra Activities available already. I think the Paint program could be used as a cheap whiteboard telemeeting option. The wifi works pretty well, and I haven&#8217;t even gotten around to exploring the T-Mobile free year&#8217;s subscription. The OLPC News forum (discussion board) is full of tips and suggestions (and critics, but also fans), and the One Laptop Per Child Learning Club - DC looks to be pretty active in 2008 (we had one fun meeting in December already). It&#8217;s not for everyone. The keyboard is just right for little hands, not so good for big paws. Its focus is on drilling down on one activity at a time rather than multitasking. There are still a few bugs in the system (e.g., jumpy trackpad). But I think it&#8217;s a great little laptop within a certain scope, and recommend it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unless they extend it again, this is the last day to get your own One Laptop Per Child laptop (by paying for two). I have enjoyed mine more the more I&#8217;ve used them &#8212; I got one with Paypal and the other by ordering over the phone (credit card). I&#8217;ve been able to mesh-collaborate successfully (Write activity; two of us working on one doc and seeing each others&#8217; changes real-time). I&#8217;m getting really fond of the Journal: reverse-chronological, add-your-own-metadata don&#8217;t-call-it-a-file-system (an answer to Catherine Devlin&#8217;s birthday wish?). I&#8217;m very happy with its 3 USB drives and 1 SD drive, its lightness and ruggedness, its ebook Tranformers and screen rotation. I&#8217;ve downloaded and used some of the extra Activities available already. I think the Paint program could be used as a cheap whiteboard telemeeting option. The wifi works pretty well, and I haven&#8217;t even gotten around to exploring the T-Mobile free year&#8217;s subscription. The OLPC News forum (discussion board) is full of tips and suggestions (and critics, but also fans), and the One Laptop Per Child Learning Club &#8211; DC looks to be pretty active in 2008 (we had one fun meeting in December already). It&#8217;s not for everyone. The keyboard is just right for little hands, not so good for big paws. Its focus is on drilling down on one activity at a time rather than multitasking. There are still a few bugs in the system (e.g., jumpy trackpad). But I think it&#8217;s a great little laptop within a certain scope, and recommend it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Cornell</title>
		<link>http://configures.sarahelkins.org/2007/08/03/fragmentation/comment-page-1/#comment-4062</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Cornell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 22:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://configures.sarahelkins.org/?p=48#comment-4062</guid>
		<description>I think WinFS (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WinFS) was supposed to solve this, but they dropped it, sadly. I&#039;ve always been interested in advanced file systems, but I&#039;m very biased: I think the OS&#039;s file system should built entirely on the link model - files connect (via tagged links) to other files. Actually, if we didn&#039;t have application islands, we&#039;d have files linked to *all* data in my world: People, events, things, etc. A kind of user-level OODB or Wiki. Naturally the links would work across networks. Maybe it&#039;s just too hard to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think WinFS (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WinFS" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WinFS</a>) was supposed to solve this, but they dropped it, sadly. I&#8217;ve always been interested in advanced file systems, but I&#8217;m very biased: I think the OS&#8217;s file system should built entirely on the link model &#8211; files connect (via tagged links) to other files. Actually, if we didn&#8217;t have application islands, we&#8217;d have files linked to *all* data in my world: People, events, things, etc. A kind of user-level OODB or Wiki. Naturally the links would work across networks. Maybe it&#8217;s just too hard to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Carnell</title>
		<link>http://configures.sarahelkins.org/2007/08/03/fragmentation/comment-page-1/#comment-3385</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Carnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 18:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://configures.sarahelkins.org/?p=48#comment-3385</guid>
		<description>&quot;Brian, I’m not convinced that we need metadata *attached* to the files, as long as there’s a way to point unambiguously to particular files with ones’ metadata. E.g., in some version management systems, each file under revision control has metadata attached (but the system just gives you the content you checked in when you do another checkout, without the metadata, but in others, the metadata is managed separately altogether.&quot;

For my local file system, I&#039;m extremely wary of metadata systems that do not embed the metadata within the file itself, as you then become dependent on that system for the metadata. For example, the first version of Photoshop Album (which is now a subset of Photoshop Elements) had a very nice photo tagging system built into it. But, like a lot of photo tagging software, it stored the metadata entirely within a database rather than embedding the metadata in the files. That&#039;s fine as long as you&#039;re committed to using that particular app for all your photo needs forever; when you decided to switch to a different product, however, too often you end up having to start over. Another common area this causes problems is song rating metadata in iTunes where people invest a lot of time rating songs only to find that a corrupted database or switching to another app renders that metadata useless.

For example, I think it is neat that people can use things like connotea to tag web pages, but imagine if rather than allowing people to tag or add categories to posts on their own weblog, that Wordpress simply said &quot;well, go use connotea or del.icio.us if you really want to tag the content on your blog.&quot; Yuck.

Clearly both MP3 and JPEG show that it is possible to get everyone to generally agree on how to implement data cross-platform into the file format itself. A standard for a simply adding, say, a single text field to all other files would greatly improve our ability to tag and organize files. Its kind of silly that I can tag a picture of an action figure as &quot;Superman&quot; and that will just work pretty much across OSes, but I can&#039;t do the same thing for a text or other file.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Brian, I’m not convinced that we need metadata *attached* to the files, as long as there’s a way to point unambiguously to particular files with ones’ metadata. E.g., in some version management systems, each file under revision control has metadata attached (but the system just gives you the content you checked in when you do another checkout, without the metadata, but in others, the metadata is managed separately altogether.&#8221;</p>
<p>For my local file system, I&#8217;m extremely wary of metadata systems that do not embed the metadata within the file itself, as you then become dependent on that system for the metadata. For example, the first version of Photoshop Album (which is now a subset of Photoshop Elements) had a very nice photo tagging system built into it. But, like a lot of photo tagging software, it stored the metadata entirely within a database rather than embedding the metadata in the files. That&#8217;s fine as long as you&#8217;re committed to using that particular app for all your photo needs forever; when you decided to switch to a different product, however, too often you end up having to start over. Another common area this causes problems is song rating metadata in iTunes where people invest a lot of time rating songs only to find that a corrupted database or switching to another app renders that metadata useless.</p>
<p>For example, I think it is neat that people can use things like connotea to tag web pages, but imagine if rather than allowing people to tag or add categories to posts on their own weblog, that Wordpress simply said &#8220;well, go use connotea or del.icio.us if you really want to tag the content on your blog.&#8221; Yuck.</p>
<p>Clearly both MP3 and JPEG show that it is possible to get everyone to generally agree on how to implement data cross-platform into the file format itself. A standard for a simply adding, say, a single text field to all other files would greatly improve our ability to tag and organize files. Its kind of silly that I can tag a picture of an action figure as &#8220;Superman&#8221; and that will just work pretty much across OSes, but I can&#8217;t do the same thing for a text or other file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: configures</title>
		<link>http://configures.sarahelkins.org/2007/08/03/fragmentation/comment-page-1/#comment-3362</link>
		<dc:creator>configures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://configures.sarahelkins.org/?p=48#comment-3362</guid>
		<description>Brian, I&#039;m not convinced that we need metadata *attached* to the files, as long as there&#039;s a way to point unambiguously to particular files with ones&#039; metadata.  E.g., in some version management systems, each file under revision control has metadata attached (but the system just gives you the content you checked in when you do another checkout, without the metadata, but in others, the metadata is managed separately altogether.  Or, for another example, with tag sharing as in Connotea, the tags I have are maintained by Connotea.  Nobody needed to change the standards to allow me to have Connotea tags on their web pages and blog entries.  So, I was picturing a personalizable tag-based file system that knows about, but does not need to modify, different operating systems&#039; file systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, I&#8217;m not convinced that we need metadata *attached* to the files, as long as there&#8217;s a way to point unambiguously to particular files with ones&#8217; metadata.  E.g., in some version management systems, each file under revision control has metadata attached (but the system just gives you the content you checked in when you do another checkout, without the metadata, but in others, the metadata is managed separately altogether.  Or, for another example, with tag sharing as in Connotea, the tags I have are maintained by Connotea.  Nobody needed to change the standards to allow me to have Connotea tags on their web pages and blog entries.  So, I was picturing a personalizable tag-based file system that knows about, but does not need to modify, different operating systems&#8217; file systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Carnell</title>
		<link>http://configures.sarahelkins.org/2007/08/03/fragmentation/comment-page-1/#comment-3281</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Carnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 03:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://configures.sarahelkins.org/?p=48#comment-3281</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still amazed that this sort of extremely obvious feature has yet to be implemented in a truly usable manner yet. I suppose part of the problem is the multitude of different file systems, but still you&#039;d think at some point an agreed upon relatively standardized method for adding simple tag metadata to files would have emerged by now. Certainly that *has* happened for a few of the prominent image file formats (like JPEG)...that there&#039;s no corresponding generic metadata system for all files is almost unbelievable. We have a bajillion DRM schemes developed to keep us from accessing our data, but still no cross-platform metadata system for helping us to find and organize our data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still amazed that this sort of extremely obvious feature has yet to be implemented in a truly usable manner yet. I suppose part of the problem is the multitude of different file systems, but still you&#8217;d think at some point an agreed upon relatively standardized method for adding simple tag metadata to files would have emerged by now. Certainly that *has* happened for a few of the prominent image file formats (like JPEG)&#8230;that there&#8217;s no corresponding generic metadata system for all files is almost unbelievable. We have a bajillion DRM schemes developed to keep us from accessing our data, but still no cross-platform metadata system for helping us to find and organize our data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

